Kagibag vs Tito
A detailed comparison to help you choose the right event platform for your needs.
Tito excels at a clean, developer-friendly ticketing experience with a solid API but struggles with everything beyond ticketing — no agenda, sponsors, networking, or mobile app. Kagibag is built for end-to-end event management — from ticketing to sponsors to networking — with one transparent fee. Choose Tito if you're a tech community running simple ticketed events and value a developer-friendly API for custom integrations. Choose Kagibag if you need an all-in-one event platform and don't want to build integrations just to get basic conference features.
At a Glance
A side-by-side snapshot of both platforms — positioning, pricing model, and core focus.
Kagibag
Tito
Detailed Feature Comparison
Beyond checkmarks — how each platform actually handles core event management capabilities.
| Feature | Kagibag | Tito |
|---|---|---|
| Ticketing & Registration | Full ticketing with all standard features | Clean, well-designed ticketing with a strong API |
| Agenda & Scheduling | Multi-track agenda builder with session management | Not available — no agenda tools |
| Speakers & CFP | Built-in CFP workflow and speaker management | Not available — no speaker management |
| Sponsors & Exhibitors | Sponsor packages, pages, exhibitor management | Not available — no sponsor tools |
| Mobile App | Native mobile app with full features | No mobile app |
| QR Check-in | QR-based check-in with real-time tracking | Good QR check-in |
| QR Networking & Contact Exchange | Built-in QR contact exchange and lead capture | Not available |
| Feedback & Surveys | Post-event and per-session feedback | Limited feedback tools |
Pricing Comparison
How costs stack up — including the hidden fees and additional tools you might need.
Kagibag
3% of ticket + sponsorship revenue. Everything included.
Tito
Platform percentage + payment gateway fees. Fees layer.
Real-World Scenario
For $50,000 in ticket revenue, Kagibag costs $1,500 total with all features. Tito charges a platform percentage plus separate gateway fees — and you still need to add and pay for separate agenda, sponsor, and networking tools.
Hidden Costs to Consider
Tito's fees stack (platform % + gateway %). For anything beyond ticketing, you're building a tool stack — which costs more time and money than a single platform.
Who Should Choose What
Honest recommendations — because the right tool depends on your specific needs.
Choose Kagibag if…
- You need more than ticketing without building custom integrations
- You want agenda, speakers, sponsors, and networking out of the box
- You run multi-track conferences or events with sponsors
- You prefer one platform over a custom-built tool stack
Choose Tito if…
- You're a tech community that values developer-friendly tools and APIs
- You only need ticketing and check-in
- You want to build custom integrations via API
- You run simple, single-focus tech events
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Kagibag vs Tito.
Is Kagibag cheaper than Tito?
Tito charges a platform percentage plus separate gateway fees, and you still need additional tools. Kagibag's 3% covers ticketing, agenda, sponsors, networking, and a mobile app — all in one fee.
Does Kagibag have more features than Tito?
Yes. Tito is ticketing only with a strong API. Kagibag includes ticketing plus agenda management, speaker CFP, sponsor packages, networking, lead capture, and a native mobile app.
Can I switch from Tito to Kagibag?
Yes. Kagibag provides the same ticketing and check-in features as Tito, plus conference-grade features like agendas, sponsors, and networking — without building custom integrations.
See the difference for yourself
Start for free — no sales calls, no contracts, no credit card required.
Get Started Free